Category Archives: California Divorce

Annulment, California Divorce, Child Custody, Domestic Violence

Best Interest of the Children: What Does It Mean for California Families?

Leave a comment

Best Interest of the Children: What Does It Mean for California Families?
California courts often cite to the “best interest of the children” standard when making rulings and issuing decisions on family law matters.  Where does this language come from, and what does it mean for you?


California laws, in many places, refer to the “best interest of the children” or “best interest of the child.” The core statute on what this means is California Family Code § 3011, which is a general provision of law relating to custody.


Section 3011 lists several factors that courts must consider when determining what is in the best interest of children:

  • The child’s “health, safety, and welfare”;
  • Any history of abuse against a child, the other parent, or a parent’s significant other;
  • The nature and amount of the child’s contact with both parents; and
  • Either parent’s use of illegal, controlled substances, or habitual use of alcohol or prescribed controlled substances.

The “best interest of the child” standard applies to many types of proceedings:

  • Divorce;
  • Annulment;
  • Legal separation;
  • Actions for exclusive custody;
  • Custody or visitation actions under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act;
  • Custody or visitation actions under the Uniform Parentage Act; and
  • Custody or visitation actions under brought by a California district attorney.

The “best interest of the child” standard is also at play in related proceedings, such as child custody evaluations and parenting plans.


The California Legislature’s widespread application of the “the best interest of the child” standard shows its commitment to the health and well-being of children. In hotly contested child support matters, you need an attorney to fight for you and your child. The attorneys at the Law Offices of Judy L. Burger have extensive experience in divorce, child custody, and child support matters. Make the call today to learn how our attorneys can protect you and your children: (415) 293-8314.

California Divorce, Domestic Violence

How Do California Courts Decide Mutual Restraining Orders?

Leave a comment

How Do California Courts Decide Mutual Restraining Orders
Troubled marriages or domestic relationships are sometimes plagued with violence. Accordingly, California’s Domestic Violence Protection Act provides authority for courts to issue restraining orders in such situations. Normally, one party to the relationship has been threatened or attacked and petitions a court to issue an order instructing the aggressor not to have contact with her. In rare cases, mutual restraining orders—those that direct both parties to stay away from the other—are issued.


Under the DVPA, a judge may issue a restraining order based on a written request from a party, but only after notice and an opportunity to respond has been given to the party to be restrained. In the case of a mutual restraining order, it is necessary that both parties make a written request for the other to be restrained. This point was recently emphasized by the Second District Court of Appeal in a divorce proceeding.


In the case, the wife filed a request for a restraining order. The husband submitted documentation in his response showing that the wife was currently restrained from contact with him by a criminal restraining order and that the wife had pleaded guilty to a charge of assault against him.


The court, of its own volition, issued a mutual restraining order prohibiting each party from having contact with the other. As its basis for restraining the wife as well as the husband, the court pointed to the criminal restraining order and found that the wife had already been restrained. As such, the court noted that the wife had already been deemed guilty of domestic violence beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the court felt it had no need to make any findings regarding the need for an order restraining her.


The appeal court reversed the lower court’s order, however, holding that a restraining order could not be issued without a written request by the party to be protected. In this case, the husband had not made such a request. Rather, he had included documentation in his response to his wife’s request showing that she was currently under restraint.


The appeal court found that the regulatory scheme of the DVPA and its legislative history were clear that a party had to make an actual request for protection. The court also pointed out that the issuance of an order without proper notice to the party to be restrained, as well as an opportunity to respond, violated constitutional standards.


As you can see, the manner in which legal matters are handled can materially affect the outcome.  If you’re involved in a divorce or separation, you should work with an attorney with substantial experience in the area, who knows the mechanics of how family law matters are handled. To obtain experienced legal help, contact the Law Offices of Judy L. Burger at (415) 259-6636 to discuss your case.

California Divorce

Who Gets to Keep Pets in a California Divorce or Separation?

Leave a comment

Who Gets to Keep Pets in a California Divorce or Separation
In some divorces or legal separations, one of the foremost concerns is what will happen to family pets. Many of us treat pets like family.  We may even ask for “custody” of them.  But the California courts treat pets as personal property, not like children.  Therefore, no one can obtain “custody” of a family pet.


Perhaps the clearest way to deal with pet “custody” issues is to avoid them in the first place.  Before you are married, include post-marital pet issues in a valid prenuptial agreement.  In such an agreement, you can deal with how you want your personal property to be split; this can include the treatment of pets.


If you didn’t have the foresight to include pets in a prenuptial agreement, all is not lost.  In most circumstances, it is best to cooperate with your soon-to-be-ex.  If your pet is important to you, you may wish to compromise on other issues in order to obtain possession of your animal.  The two of you may even agree to an informal arrangement for where the pet will live, or even for visitation.


Under normal circumstances, it is best to agree on the arrangement for the family pet.  However, if the parties cannot agree, the judge will decide who receives the pet.  Here are some likely considerations:

  • The connections of the pet with the parties and the children;
  • The pet’s primary caretaker; and
  • Acts or threats of violence against the pet, the other party, or a minor child.

This last factor can be particularly important because California has a statute designed to protect pets. California Family Code § 6320, which became effective in 2014, allows courts to take actions to protect personal property from destruction.  If a party can show “good cause,” a court can do two things: (1) grant the exclusive “care, possession, or control” of a pet to the appropriate party; and (2) order a party “to stay away from the animal and forbid” the taking or disposal of the animal.


At the Law Offices of Judy L. Burger, we understand how important family pets are not only to a couple but to their children.  Pets can provide stability and love in a time of instability. Make the call today to learn how our attorneys can advocate for you: (415) 293-8314.

California Divorce

Ashley Madison Data Breach Could Impact Divorces

Leave a comment

Ashley Madison Data Breach Could Impact DivorcesMedia stories on the Ashley Madison hack have spotlighted data security and privacy issues. But there is much more at stake: families. Some have speculated that the release of the Ashley Madison data will lead to increased marital problems and divorce rates.


Before last summer, many people would have had no idea that Ashley Madison was anything other than a person’s name. Now, people nationwide recognize Ashley Madison as a hook-up site for those who are married.


In case you missed it, the personal and private data of over 33 million of Ashley Madison’s customers was recently compromised. The hackers scored traditional personally identifiable information, such as names, street names, passwords, partial credit card debt, and telephone numbers. However, they also accessed private information of a very intimate nature, such as sexual fantasies and message history.


Much of this information was posted online for the world to see. Suddenly, friends, spouses, and others knew not only who was a customer of Ashley Madison but much, much more.


What are the implications of this giant data breach in family law?


Very early on, some divorce attorneys predicted a spike in the divorce rate. Certainly, the ability to confirm infidelity could cause spouses who previously weren’t sure about divorcing to file their papers.


But the implications of this data breach could be wider than originally thought.


Suddenly, one partner is armed with what would appear to be undeniable evidence of infidelity, and the other partner is likely to be riddled with guilt. This imbalance could cause the former to stake out a position and refuse to budge and the latter to simply fold. Is it possible that these feelings could affect the outcome of divorce proceedings?


Any issue that is wholly or partly in the parties’ control could be easily affected. For example, the parties have a great deal of influence on issues such as personal property division and visitation plans. The guilty partner might feel obligated to cave in, and often, the judge will approve the parties’ plan as long as it is reasonable. Likewise, the imbalance in perceived power could greatly affect settlement and, because feelings are hurt, drive up attorney fees in protracted litigation.


Some issues, however, will not be impacted. For example, California law explicitly spells out how property division will take place. Barring proof of money spent by the guilty partner on affairs, which might be considered marital waste, property division will not be affected. Custody of the parties’ children also will not be affected, as the core focus in custody determinations is the “best interest of the children” and the factors considered by courts are spelled out by law.


If you’re involved in a divorce and don’t know where to turn, you should work with an experienced, compassionate attorney who can help guide you through California law. Attorneys at The Law Offices of Judy L. Burger have substantial experience in Northern California family law, including cases involving infidelity. Please contact us today at (415) 259-6636 to learn more.

How Is Paternity Established
California Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support

How Is Paternity Established and Why Does It Matter?

Leave a comment

Establishing paternity—the father of a child—is increasingly necessary in today’s non-traditional family structures. People who have not been touched by this issue might be surprised to know that it is not simply a matter of DNA testing.


When a child is born to a married couple who reside together, the law presumes that the husband is the father. More and more often, however, children are born to couples who are not married. When this happens, a determination must be made as to the father of the child.


Medical care providers are required to provide information to the mother of the child regarding a “voluntary declaration of paternity.” If the mother and the father sign a voluntary declaration, the father will be listed on the birth certificate and will have paternal rights and responsibilities under state law. There is no test required to prove that the father is biologically related to the child.


When no one steps forward to acknowledge paternity, a superior court can make the determination. This typically happens when the biological father does not know of his parentage or wants to avoid involvement with the child. A paternity action can be initiated in court by 1) the child’s mother, 2) the man claiming or denying paternity, 3) a child support agency, or 4) an adoption agency. In this situation, DNA testing is normally used to resolve the conflict.


The reasons for establishing paternity are several. Foremost is the need for financial support for the child. It is also in the State of California’s interest to see that both parents support their child. Otherwise, public assistance may be necessary to support the child. Appropriately, and as noted above, the state child support agency can therefore bring an action to establish paternity.


Another reason for establishing the identity of the father is for health care purposes. Eligibility for health insurance is an important benefit for children. A court can order health care coverage as appropriate once paternity is established. Genetic health information is also important for the child’s wellbeing throughout his life. Many health care decisions are impacted by genetic predispositions inherited from one’s parents.


The emotional and social development of a child can also be positively affected by a child having a father in his life. Even though the father may not live in the home, appropriate visitation arrangements can be made that will support the parent and child relationship. Even if the relationship is minimal, children are better off emotionally and socially knowing the identity of their fathers.


The attorneys at The Law Offices of Judy L. Burger have extensive experience in family law, including paternity matters. Make the call today to learn how our attorneys can help you proceed through the divorce process while protecting your rights or those of loved ones: (415) 298-8314.
California Divorce

How Divorce Proceedings Work in California

Leave a comment

How Divorce Proceedings Work in CaliforniaLike most states, California provides for divorce on a “no fault” basis. This means that there is no need for a demonstration as to whom or what has caused a marriage to fail. Instead, a spouse initiating a divorce must only cite “irreconcilable differences.”


The beginning point for a divorce is when one party files a petition and a summons with the Superior Court in the county in which she resides. After the filing of these forms, the petitioner arranges for a copy of the forms to be served on her spouse. Service of the forms must be made by someone other than the petitioner who is at least 18 years of age, and there is a specific form to be completed to show that the forms were personally handed to the receiving spouse, who becomes known as the “respondent.”


The respondent has 30 days to file a response with the court and to deliver a copy to the petitioner in the same manner as the petition was provided to him. After the response is filed, the petitioner and respondent complete financial forms that document the marital assets and debts so that an equitable property division may be determined by the court. For more information about property division in California, see my earlier blog here.


Marital assets and debts are those that were accumulated during the period of the marriage. They do not include any accrued by either spouse before marriage or after the date of separation. For information about the law’s handling of separate and apart, see my blog here. Marital assets also do not include anything that was inherited individually by either party, even during the marriage.


Sometimes, the parties can work amicably to decide how their assets and debts can be divided. In this case, a proposed agreement will be presented to the court and will be made part of the final divorce decree. If no agreement is achieved, the parties will attend a mandatory settlement conference. Any issues that remain unresolved at the settlement conference will be brought before a judge, who will make the final determination of the distribution.

Spousal support, sometimes referred to as “alimony,” may be considered and awarded by the court. Many factors are considered by the court in awarding spousal support, such as the length of the marriage or partnership, the marital standard of living, and each party’s income earning capacity and needs. For a complete listing of the factors considered by California courts in awarding spousal support, see my earlier blog here. If the parties come to an agreement on spousal support, the court will normally accept that and incorporate it in the decree.


When the parties have minor or dependent children, child support and child custody must also determined. As with the other matters, an agreement between the parties will be accepted by the court. For a complete discussion about how child support is determined in California, see my blog here.


The attorneys at The Law Offices of Judy L. Burger have extensive experience in family law, including the dissolution of  marriages and domestic partnerships. Make the call today to learn how our attorneys can help you proceed through the divorce process while protecting your rights or those of loved ones: (415) 298-8314.

California Divorce

How Are Appraisers Used in California Divorce Proceedings?

Leave a comment

How Are Appraisers Used in California Divorce Proceedings?In any divorce, the value of the marital estate must be established before the parties can be allocated their rightful share. The value many assets is obvious, but that is not the case for real estate. This type of property must be assigned a value. Most often, an appraiser will be hired to perform a formal litigation and real estate appraisal.


Real estate in a divorce usually is the family home, but it may also include vacation homes or business property. Business property is sometimes appraised within the context of the business itself being valued. See my previous blogs here regarding business valuations in divorce proceedings.


The parties to a divorce may retain their own appraisers or jointly select one. If the parties ultimately do not agree on a figure as suggested by the appraisal(s), the court will hear testimony and determine the fair market value. The appraisal of property can be pretty straightforward much of the time, but it can also become somewhat complicated and, at times, subjective.


Most appraisals are based on the sales of comparable properties in the geographic area. An average sale price is normally the key indicator, but any special or unique features of a home may increase or decrease the value assigned by a particular appraiser. For example, a detached garage converted to a workshop with special wiring for power tools might cause an appraiser to add to the average sale price. On the other hand, a backyard greenhouse might be seen as a specialty item that clutters the property and cost money to have removed.


It is also important to know that the assessed value of the property by county or municipal governments is researched by the appraiser, but these values usually have no real effect on fair market value. The assessed values are not based on professional appraisals and are also sometimes affected by laws governing the assessment of real property.


In selecting an appraiser, first make sure she is licensed by the state. Second, it is important to find someone who is knowledgeable of the local market and of the type of property being appraised. If there is business property, make sure the appraiser has experience or even specializes in that area. Similarly, if there is vacation property, make sure you hire someone in that market. An appraiser in San Francisco won’t know the business of vacation homes in Vail, Colorado.


Judy L. Burger’s experience as an aggressive family lawyer is paired with an extensive business background, an invaluable combination in contested divorce and separation proceedings. If you need the assistance of a lawyer who is not afraid to fight in court and who understands complicated financial issues, call her today at (415) 293-8314 or visit her online.

Can I Recover Attorney Fees in My California Divorce?
California Divorce

Can I Recover Attorney Fees in My California Divorce?

Leave a comment


The payment of attorney’s fees in a divorce proceeding is not always a simple matter. You might think that each party hires a lawyer and dives into the process. California Family Code § 2030, however, requires the family court to ensure that each party has access to legal representation.


In that regard, the court may award attorney’s fees to be paid by one party to the other or her attorney. This happens when an income and needs assessment indicates a disparity in the parties’ access to funds.


An award may be in any amount deemed reasonably necessary to defend or maintain the proceeding during its pendency. The court’s authority to make an award is tempered by the ability of one party to pay the fees of the other. If a party is unrepresented or attempting self-representation, the court may order the other party to pay a reasonable amount to permit the unrepresented party to hire a lawyer before proceedings start.


At all times, the court is required by California Family Code § 2032 to ensure that awards of attorney’s fees are just and reasonable given the relative circumstances of the respective parties. To make such a determination, the court must take into account the need for the award, to the extent that it will allow the parties to adequately present their cases. Awards may be made from any asset of the parties, whether community or separate.


Pursuant to California Family Code § 271, attorney’s fees may also be awarded when one party or her attorney acts in a way that inhibits the progression of the case. The Code states as the policy of the law “to promote settlement of litigation and, where possible, to reduce the cost of litigation by encouraging cooperation between the parties and attorneys.” Such actions may include the refusal to communicate as necessary to advance the case, the filing of frivolous motions, or similar behavior. Awards under this section of the Code are restricted by a party’s ability to pay, and they may only be awarded after notice and opportunity to be heard. Awards of this nature may be paid only from the separate property of the sanctioned party, including her share of community assets.


As you might imagine, the financial positions of the parties to a divorce can be complex and must be accurately portrayed to a court. Judy L. Burger has substantial experience in California family courts, and she also has a business background that allows her to effectively analyze and present financial information. Please contact her at (415) 259-6636 or visit her website to learn more.

California Divorce

Why Is There a Mandatory Waiting Period to Get a Divorce in California?

Leave a comment

Can I Recover Attorney Fees in My California Divorce?Many states have waiting periods for a divorce to become final after the process begins. In California, it is six months after the petitioner serves notice on the respondent. The petitioner is the person initiating the divorce, and the respondent is the spouse or domestic partner.


The primary purpose of the waiting period is to give the parties time to consider their course of action and to reconcile if that is possible. Secondarily, the time also allows for the parties to prepare for a hearing or settlement negotiation. There is substantial documentation necessary to effect a divorce, and it can take a lot of time for it to be assembled. Even after that is done, mediation or settlement discussions are common and can take a long time.


Other issues can also make the waiting period seem inconsequential. For example, when children are involved, other time-consuming activities can be required, especially if issues are being contested. At a minimum, the court will require custody mediation, which forces the parties to meet and consider child custody arrangements. If the issue is being contested by either or both parties, then motions asking the court to make decisions will also take time to resolve.


California has one of the shorter waiting periods. Some states have one-year periods, and others are contemplating even longer periods. The main argument against waiting periods at all, and especially long ones, is the possibility of domestic violence during that time.


Many divorcing couples do not have the means to maintain separate households during the pendency of a divorce. In addition, the very nature of divorce is that some level of acrimony exists between the parties. Consequently, many divorcing couples are living in an increasingly uncomfortable situation under the same roof awaiting the dissolution of their marriage. With children in the mix, it can only be worse. Therefore, the waiting period can be a serious problem in certain situations rather than acting as the savior of a marriage.


The attorneys at The Law Offices of Judy L. Burger have extensive experience in family law, including the dissolution of  marriages and domestic partnerships. Make the call today to learn how our attorneys can help you proceed through the divorce process while protecting your rights or those of loved ones: (415) 298-8314.

California Divorce, Visitation

As a Grandparent, What Rights Do I Have to Visitation?

Leave a comment

As a Grandparent, What Rights Do I Have to Visitation?
Grandparents can be a stabilizing force for children whose parents divorce or legally separate. Indeed, the California Legislature has recognized this, providing affirmatively for grandparent visitation.


Sections 3100-3105 of the California Family Code describe the circumstances under which grandparents may obtain visitation with their grandchildren.


When One Parent Is Deceased


It is easiest for a grandparent to obtain visitation when one of the parents is deceased. In such an unfortunate case, a court need only determine that grandparent visitation is in the best interest of the child.


However, a grandparent cannot use this provision of the law if the child has been adopted by someone other than a stepparent or another grandparent. Likewise, if a grandparent previously obtained visitation under this section of the law, the visitation automatically terminates if the child is adopted by someone other than a stepparent or another grandparent.


Other Cases of Grandparent Visitation


If both parents are alive but divorced, a grandparent who wants visitation with his or her grandchild must proceed under a different law. Under that law, before reasonable grandparent visitation may be granted, a court must do two things: (1) find that the two have had a relationship in the past that “engendered a bond” between them, rendering visitation in the child’s best interest; and (2) balance the child’s interest in grandparent visitation with the parents’ right to “exercise their parental authority.” Cal. Fam. Code § 3104.


However, a court may not order grandparent visitation when the parents are still married unless one of the following six circumstances exist:

  • The parents are either permanently or indefinitely separated;
  • The whereabouts of one of the parents have been unknown to the other parent for at least one month;
  • One of the parents joins the petition for grandparent visitation;
  • The child does not live with either parent;
  • A stepparent has adopted the child; or
  • One of the parents is either in jail or has been institutionalized.

In these limited circumstances, grandparent visitation may be granted; however, if the supporting circumstance ends, either parent may successfully move to have grandparent visitation terminated.


The attorneys at The Law Offices of Judy L. Burger have extensive legal experience in family law matters. We have handled all types of visitation requests, including those involving grandparents. Contact us today at (415) 259-6636 to learn how we can help you in this area.