Preparing for Periodic Child Support Order Reviews Under SB 343

April 28, 2025 TRIWriter

California’s new child support law, Senate Bill 343, aims to make the child support system more equitable and personalized. The new law will take effect on January 1, 2026, and one change families should prepare for is the Child Support Order review. CA Certified Family Law Specialist Judy L. Burger shares more about preparing for this new requirement.

Periodic Reviews Of Child Support Orders

Senate Bill SB 343 establishes a requirement for periodic reviews of child support orders to adjust these obligations under evolving circumstances. These reviews will consider changes in the parents’ income, employment status, and the child’s needs over time.

Has your income recently increased or decreased? Why? (Retirement, layoffs, termination, job change, etc.)
Has your employment status changed? How? Why? (Termination, self-employed, layoffs, retirement, changed jobs, etc.)
Have the child’s needs changed? How? (Aging, health concerns, driving, school/college, working, etc.)

The new guidelines seek to maintain fairness in child support arrangements by implementing regular assessments. This ensures that the obligations reflect the current situations of both parents and the child. This provision allows for modifications to child support orders as necessary, promoting ongoing equity in child support agreements.

Here’s a more detailed explanation of how SB 343 impacts child support order reviews:

Mandatory Follow-up (FC 17430(e)): Local Child Support Agencies (LCSAs) are required to review cases within one year of judgment and annually thereafter, until a modified order is entered.
Focus on Income and Earning Capacity: The primary purpose of these reviews is to determine if there is sufficient additional evidence to establish an order based on the defendant’s actual income, or to establish a different earning capacity order.
Mandate for LCSAs: LCSAs must file a motion to modify the support order prospectively within 60 days if a review finds sufficient additional evidence to do so.

Senate Bill 343 introduces the possibility of deviating from standard child support guidelines when payments may place an undue burden on low-income parents. This provision recognizes that a uniform approach to child support may not be suitable for every case, allowing for greater flexibility in establishing obligations based on individual circumstances. Family law attorney Judy Burger can provide guidance to help you understand how these provisions might pertain to your specific situation.

What If the Review Raises or Lowers My Child Support Obligations?

The review will examine the most current information detailing your income and expenses, and the child’s needs. This includes:

Your income documents
Your expense documents
Any child care expenses
Medical insurance
Your disability status
Jail or prison status
Unemployment benefits
Retirement income
Your current custody and visitation arrangements

After reviewing the information you and the other parent provide, your local agency will determine whether a modification is needed and, if so, decide on a new amount of support. As a general rule, a modification may be granted if the support order would change by 20% or $50, whichever is less.

If you disagree with the proposed changes for an increase or decrease, you are entitled to a hearing before a family court to hear your case and determine a more balanced outcome. Family law attorney Judy Burger can help you prepare and argue your case.

Ensure Compliance with New CA Child Support Laws

Family Law Attorney Judy L. Burger specializes in guiding clients through child support matters, providing expert counsel to protect your rights and prioritize your child’s best interests. As a California Certified Family Law Specialist, Judy Burger is equipped to help you navigate any changes or challenges you may face in family law issues.

If you need help addressing your family’s needs, we encourage you to contact one of our offices to schedule a consultation. You can contact us at 415-293-8314 and request an appointment at the location nearest you, which includes Gold River, San Francisco, San Jose, Beverly Hills, San Diego, Oxnard, San Rafael, or Santa Barbara, CA.

California Divorce, Child Custody

How Does Social Media Affect My Child Custody Case?

April 21, 2025 TRIWriter

Social media content, including posts, pictures, comments, and videos, can be used as evidence in child custody cases, potentially impacting your outcome. Careful consideration of your online presence is crucial during a custody battle. California Certified Family Law Specialist Judy L. Burger knows social media’s power and potential impacts, providing significant insight into this challenge.

How Social Media Can Affect Your Child Custody Case

Family court judges put the children’s best interests first when determining custody arrangements. Parental behavior is closely scrutinized. Carrying on as usual by posting anything and everything on your social media accounts is a grave mistake. Your spouse’s attorney will put everything online under the microscope and use it against you. Even deleting posts does not help – screenshots of past messages and posts can come back to haunt you.

Here are some ways social media can negatively impact your child custody case:

Evidence of Parental Fitness: Judges can use social media posts to assess a parent’s character, lifestyle, and ability to provide a stable and safe environment for a child.
Risky Behavior: Pictures or videos showing excessive partying, drug use, or criminal activity can raise concerns about your ability to care for a child.
Negativity and Conflict: Negative comments about the other parent or public sharing of conflicts can be seen as evidence of hostility and a lack of ability to co-parent.
Parenting Style and Values: Your social media presence can reflect your parenting style, values, and involvement in the child’s life.
Child’s Privacy: Violating a child’s privacy by posting excessive photos of them online could lead to negative consequences and be a source of conflict with the other parent.
Inconsistencies and Misrepresentations: Social media posts can be used to prove financial discrepancies or inconsistencies regarding a parent’s claims.
Emotional Impact: Social media during a custody battle can be stressful and add to the emotional burden of the situation.
Harassment: Social media can be used for harassment and cyberstalking. If one parent uses social media to harass, threaten, or intimidate the other parent, this can result in criminal charges.

Remember, social media posts are often accessible to law enforcement, prosecutors, and private investigators without a warrant.

Tips for Managing Social Media During a Custody Case

CA Child Custody Lawyer Judy Burger recommends the following to guide your social media activity during your custody case:

Exercise Caution: Be mindful of what you post, especially regarding your ex-spouse, the child, or lifestyle.
Adjust Privacy Settings: Use your social media platforms’ privacy settings to control who can see your posts and profile information.
Avoid Negative Comments: Refrain from posting negative comments or engaging in public arguments about your ex-spouse.
Be Strategic: If you wish to share photos or information about your children, do so cautiously, focusing on positive interactions and involvement.
Review Posts and Comments: Review your social media activity and be prepared for any negative repercussions or requests for screenshots during the custody case.
Less is More: If you have any doubts about what to share, don’t share anything.

What If My Spouse Uses Social Media Against Me?

If your spouse uses your social media posts against you in a custody battle, it’s a serious situation, but not insurmountable. Focus on demonstrating your ability to co-parent effectively and consult with Attorney Judy Burger to strategize on addressing this issue. Here are some valuable strategies:

Focus on the Facts: Present a case highlighting your positive qualities as a parent and your commitment to the child’s well-being, focusing on facts and evidence rather than emotional arguments.
Turn the Tables: If you have examples of your spouse’s social media posts, especially ones that demonstrate their own issues, you may be able to use them to rebut their claims.
Be Honest and Accountable: Address the social media posts calmly and rationally, explaining the context or clarifying any misunderstandings.

Seek Legal Advice for Child Custody Matters in California

Social media plays a huge role in today’s digital age. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and other platforms showcase people’s experiences, ideas, daily activities, and even their conflicts. This instantaneous connection with the world can have unintended consequences for your child custody case.

Consult with CA Family Law Attorney Judy Burger to understand how social media can affect your specific case and receive guidance on navigating social media during a custody battle. Contact us online or call one of our eight offices near you to schedule a consultation.

Domestic Violence, Restraining Order, Restraining Order

How Do CA Gun Violence Restraining Orders Work?

April 14, 2025 TRIWriter

California is known for strict gun laws to protect its citizens from crime and domestic violence. The state legislature first approved Gun Restraining Orders in 2016. How do CA Gun Violence Restraining Orders work, and when do you need one? CA Certified Family Law Specialist Judy L. Burger discusses CA Gun Restraining Orders and how they work.

What Is a Gun Violence Restraining Order?

A Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO) is a court order that prevents someone from accessing firearms and ammunition. It’s also known as a “red flag law.”

“The GVRO provides an opportunity to remove guns from individuals who would not otherwise be prohibited from possessing firearms.” This legally binding order reduces the risk of gun-related violence for between one to five years, allowing the person in crisis to get help.

The judge may issue a temporary Gun Violence Restraining Order before the scheduled hearing and grant other restraining orders as necessary. A temporary GVRO lasts for 21 days. If the judge grants a 1-5-year GVRO, a law enforcement officer will serve the papers to the person and collect any firearms, ammunition, and magazines. The subject of a GVRO cannot legally purchase any guns, magazines, or ammunition while the order is in force. The court may extend a GVRO.

A GVRO requires the subject of the order to relinquish all firearms and ammunition and prohibits the subject from purchasing any guns or ammunition while the order is in effect.

When Would I Need a GVRO?

When should you consider petitioning the court for a gun violence restraining order? Under California Penal Code Section 18150, a Gun Violence Restraining Order can prohibit an individual who poses a significant danger of self-injury or injuring another from owning, possessing, purchasing, receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive a firearm or ammunition.

Threats or acts of domestic violence are common reasons to ask for a GVRO. The United States Department of Justice defines domestic violence as: “Domestic violence is a pattern of abusive behavior in any relationship that is used by one partner to gain or maintain power and control over another intimate partner. Domestic violence can be physical, sexual, emotional, economic, psychological, or technological actions or threats of actions or other patterns of coercive behavior that influence another person within an intimate partner relationship. This includes any behaviors that intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, blame, hurt, injure, or wound someone.”

The California Family Code defines domestic violence as abuse perpetrated against an “intimate partner” or family member. This can include spouses, former spouses, cohabitants, individuals in dating relationships, parents, and children. While physical violence often comes to mind first, domestic violence also encompasses emotional and psychological abuse, including threats of harm.

In the context of domestic violence, a threat can be considered abusive if it instills fear, apprehension, or intimidation in the victim. Even if the threatened harm does not materialize, the impact on the victim’s emotional well-being is considered.

How Do I Obtain a GVRO in California?

The following people can request a Gun Violence Restraining Order against an individual:

An immediate family member
An employer
A coworker, if they have had substantial and regular interactions with the subject for at least one year and have obtained the employer’s approval
An employee or teacher of a secondary or postsecondary school that the subject has attended in the last six months, if the employee or teacher has obtained the approval of a school administrator or a school administration staff member with a supervisorial role
A law enforcement officer
A roommate
An individual who has a dating relationship with the subject
An individual who has a child in common with the subject, if they have had substantial and regular interactions with the subject for at least one year

You can ask a law enforcement officer to ask for a gun violence restraining order. If it is an emergency, you can call police and ask for one right away. If you do not want to call police for help, Family Law Attorney Judy Burger can help you petition the court and handle the details.

Get Help with Gun Restraining Orders in California

You do not have to remain in threatening, abusive, or dangerous relationships. CA Certified Family Law Specialist Judy Burger can help you when you need legal protection or seek to protect someone close to you from committing harm or harming themselves. We have eight offices across California to serve you. Schedule a consultation to get answers to your questions about Gun Violence Restraining Orders and other types of restraining orders. We can offer counsel, help you file petitions with the court, and get the help you need now.

California Divorce, Property Division

Wasteful Misconduct and Community Property Divisions

April 7, 2025 TRIWriter

Navigating property division during a divorce can be complicated in California, particularly when issues of wasteful misconduct arise. Understanding how wasteful conduct is defined and its implications on the community property division process is crucial for both parties. California Certified Family Law Specialist Judy L. Burger discusses the implications of wasteful misconduct on property divisions and how to react if you suspect it has occurred.

What is Wasteful Misconduct?

Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law defines wasteful misconduct (under ‘dissipation,’ as in ‘dissipation of marital assets’) as “to use (marital assets) for one’s own benefit and to the exclusion of one’s spouse for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irretrievable breakdown.”

It is also called wasteful dissipation or the dissipation of marital assets. This behavior can manifest in various ways, including

Extravagant spending
Spending money on an affair
Taking out loans without the other spouse’s consent
Selling property below market value
Excessive gambling
Reckless financial decisions
Giving large sums of money to family members or third parties
Destroying property
Engaging in activities that diminish property value
Failed investments

The Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute maintains that “economic misconduct (e.g., dissipation of assets) will be considered when dividing property.”

Community Property in California

California is a community property state, meaning that most assets and debts acquired during the marriage are jointly owned and subject to equal division upon divorce. However, the characterization of assets can become contentious when one spouse engages in wasteful misconduct that affects the value of the community estate.

Possible Impacts of Wasteful Misconduct on Property Division

Keep the following aspects of this problem in mind as you approach divorce and the suspected dissipation of marital assets:

Reimbursement for Dissipated Assets: If one spouse can prove that the other engaged in wasteful misconduct, they may be entitled to reimbursement for the value of the dissipated assets. This reimbursement can be considered when dividing the remaining community property, potentially impacting the final distribution.
Increased or Decreased Share: Courts have discretion in determining how to address wasteful misconduct when dividing property. If misconduct is proven, the errant spouse may receive a smaller percentage of the community property. In contrast, the other spouse may receive a larger share to compensate for the wasted assets.
Burden of Proof: The spouse alleging wasteful misconduct has the burden of proof. They must provide clear and convincing evidence of the misconduct and its impact on community property. This may require detailed financial records, testimonies, and expert evaluations to substantiate the claims.

What Should I Do If I Suspect Wasteful Misconduct in My CA Divorce?

When facing issues of wasteful misconduct in a divorce, keep the following considerations in mind:

Document Everything: Maintaining comprehensive records of financial transactions is vital. This includes bank statements, receipts, and any relevant communications that may demonstrate wasteful behavior.
Focus on Resolution: While addressing wasteful misconduct can be important, it is crucial to focus on the overall resolution and its long-term impact on your financial future. Aim for a property division that reflects fairness and preserves your interests.
Consult with a Legal Professional: California Certified Family Law Specialist Judy L. Burger can help you navigate the complexities surrounding wasteful misconduct. She can provide guidance on evidence collection, help establish a legal strategy, and represent your interests during negotiations.

Resolving Complex Divorce Property Divisions in California

Wasteful misconduct can significantly influence the division of community property in a California divorce. Understanding the implications of such behavior and the legal recourse available is essential for both spouses. If you believe wasteful misconduct has occurred during your marriage, seek legal guidance to protect your rights and interests.

Navigating the complexities of divorce is challenging, and having a knowledgeable advocate can make a significant difference in achieving a fair resolution. If you’re facing a divorce and suspect wasteful misconduct, contact The Law Offices of Judy L. Burger for support and professional guidance tailored to your situation.